在 6/15/22 5:34 PM, Gionatan Danti 写道:
Il 2022-06-15 09:42 Zhiyong Ye ha scritto:
I regenerated the thin volume with the chunksize of 64K and the random
write performance data tested with fio 64k requests is as follows:
case iops
thin lv 9381
snapshotted thin lv 8307
As expected, increasing I/O size (to avoid r/m/w) greatly reduced the
issue (the ~11% hit is due to metadata allocation overhead).
I don't see anything wrong, so I think you had to live with the
previously recorded 10x performance hit when overwriting 4K blocks on a
64K chunk size thin volume...
I also think it meets expectations. But is there any other way to
optimize snapshot performance at the code level? Does it help to reduce
the chunksize size in the code, I see in the help documentation that the
chunksize can only be 64k minimum.
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
