On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hmm, upon closer look, there are more conflicts between
> > <asm/asm-offsets.h> and other header files, and
> > arch/m68k/kernel/ptrace.c does need some of the PT_* definitions from
> > <asm/ptrace.h>, so I can't just kill them. I guess I'll have to rename the
> > conflicting ones in asm-offsets.
> > 
> > First patch (still fails to build the whole tree) below.
> 
> Below is an alternative approach (which at least compiles :) ), which 
> avoids any direct or indirect dependency on task structure information. 
> Only the init_task definition is a little ugly as there is currently no 
> way to get the task_struct without pulling all of sched.h

Any chance you can push this to Linus for 2.6.20?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to