On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 20:47, Maxim Kuvyrkov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/23/09 9:37 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 14:01, Geert Uytterhoeven<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 20:47, Maxim Kuvyrkov<[email protected]>wrote:
>
> ...
>>>>
>>>> The question is which solution should we adopt. The patch I posted
>>>> fixes
>>>> all current problems with have on our hands. Andreas suggested to move
>>>> to
>>>> the generic layout of `struct siginfo' which will make future problems
>>>> less
>>>> likely, but this approach may need additional investigation.
>>>
>>> If moving to the generic layout decreases the probability of future
>>> problems,
>>> it's the way to go.
>>
>> Do we have a patch somewhere?
>
> Here it is, the patch is rather simple.
>
> I'm swamped at the moment, so I'll appreciate if someone verifies that the
> kernel runs fine with this patch applied.
Verified and applied. Thanks a lot!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
