3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------ From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> commit ed585a651681e822089087b426e6ebfb6d3d9873 upstream. If an irq_chip provides .irq_shutdown(), but neither of .irq_disable() or .irq_mask(), free_irq() crashes when jumping to NULL. Fix this by only trying .irq_disable() and .irq_mask() if there's no .irq_shutdown() provided. This revives the symmetry with irq_startup(), which tries .irq_startup(), .irq_enable(), and irq_unmask(), and makes it consistent with the comment for irq_chip.irq_shutdown() in <linux/irq.h>, which says: * @irq_shutdown: shut down the interrupt (defaults to ->disable if NULL) This is also how __free_irq() behaved before the big overhaul, cfr. e.g. 3b56f0585fd4c02d047dc406668cb40159b2d340 ("genirq: Remove bogus conditional"), where the core interrupt code always overrode .irq_shutdown() to .irq_disable() if .irq_shutdown() was NULL. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- kernel/irq/chip.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ void irq_shutdown(struct irq_desc *desc) desc->depth = 1; if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_shutdown) desc->irq_data.chip->irq_shutdown(&desc->irq_data); - if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable) + else if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable) desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data); else desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
