On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:34, Paul Bolle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 10:26 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> > 1) If SERIAL_8250_HP300 is set but neither HPDCA nor HPAPCI are set we
>> > end up with an elaborate nop, don't we? Initialization should always
>> > fail in that case. So effectively SERIAL_8250_HP300 depends on HPDCA
>> > and/or HPAPCI. Was there perhaps some problem in translating that
>> > dependency into a Kconfig dependency?
>
> [...]
>
>> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250_hp300.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250_hp300.c
>> > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>> > #include "8250.h"
>> >
>> > #if !defined(CONFIG_HPDCA) && !defined(CONFIG_HPAPCI)
>> > -#warning CONFIG_8250 defined but neither CONFIG_HPDCA nor CONFIG_HPAPCI
>> > defined, are you sure?
>> > +#warning CONFIG_SERIAL_8250 defined but neither CONFIG_HPDCA nor
>> > CONFIG_HPAPCI defined, are you sure?
>> > #endif
>>
>> What is the point of this warning anyway? Shouldn't everything necessary
>> be taken care of by Kconfig rules?
>
> That's exactly what I'm trying to find out with my questions (aimed at
> the m68k people, see 1) above).
I already had that on my todo list...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
