Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:45, Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 21:34, Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Define again the syscalls that are used by glibc so that it is possible to
>>> compile a feature-complete glibc with the newest kernel headers.
>>
>> I'm a bit puzzled by this. What exactly is your objective? To build a glibc
>> that
>> runs on any possible kernel version ever released?
>
> When building glibc it needs to know these numbers. Otherwise only
> stubs are generated that never try to use them.
Yes, I know that.
What's the user experience advantage of glibc knowing about the syscall
numbers for (never implemented) streams?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
