On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 08:03, <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Greg Ungerer <[email protected]>
>
> Compiling for the m68knommu/68328 Palm/Pilot target you get:
>
> AS arch/m68k/platform/68328/head-pilot.o
> arch/m68k/platform/68328/head-pilot.S:37:23: fatal error: bootlogo.rh: No
> such file or directory
>
> The Makefile contains rules to make the bootlogo.rh file from the C source
> bootlogo.h. But it is missing a dependency that compiling head-pilot.S needs
> bootlogo.rh.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile
> b/arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile
> index e4dfd8f..704e36d 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ROM) += romvec.o
> extra-y := head.o
> extra-$(CONFIG_M68328) += bootlogo.rh head.o
>
> +$(obj)/head-pilot.o: $(obj)/bootlogo.rh
> +$(obj)/head-rom.o: $(obj)/bootlogo.rh
> +
> $(obj)/bootlogo.rh: $(src)/bootlogo.h
> perl $(src)/bootlogo.pl < $(src)/bootlogo.h > $(obj)/bootlogo.rh
Nothing serious, you just made me wondering:
1. Any chance bootlogo.h can be generated from a more edit-friendly format,
cfr. drivers/video/logo/?
2. Why do you include the *.rh file from an assembler source file, instead of
including the *.h file from a C source file?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
