On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Philippe De Muyter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:25:44PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> On 08/06/12 23:35, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> ...
>>>
>>> I mentionned that only to make you able to soften the commit comment :)
>>
>> Ok, makes sense. I should probably have mentioned that this means
>> the ColdFire processors currently support by Linux :-)
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>>   All of the current Linux supported ColdFire CPUs handle unaligned
>>   memory accesses. So remove the CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED option
>>   selection for ColdFire. If we ever support a specific ColdFire CPU
>>   that does not support unaligned accesses then we can insert the
>>   CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED for that specific CPU type.
>
> That's perfect.  The line about dumb copying of the m68knommu settings
> was too much self-flagellation for you to my eyes :)

So I rewrote history on my for-3.6 branch...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to