On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 08:38:26PM +1200, schmitz wrote:
> I'm sure it was one of these 'how can we get some piece of code
> reused to do something almost entirely unrelated' ideas. Sounds like
> what I'd have done just to solve the hwclock handling and get on
> with hacking other stuff without being irritated by constant fscks
> ...
>
> Code quality has improved a huge lot since. Keep in mind that mac68k
> was developed separate from m68k in the beginning. I have never had
> Alan's instinct for writing good clean code, 'it works' was usually
> good enough.
I hope nobody took my comments as criticism of their coding skills. I'm
pretty sure I was not only involved in but at the time actively advocated
the solution I was saying was a bad idea. I've certainly been guilty of
as much or more sloppy coding than everyone else.
In any case, I want to encourage all the people who still do work on
this that their work is not wasted and people do appreciate it.
Brad Boyer
[email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
