Geert Uytterhoeven píše v Pá 16. 08. 2013 v 23:57 +0200:
> 141114880 bytes (141 MB) copied, 17.09 seconds, 8.3 MB/s
> So nfhd is slower than emulated IDE?

nfhd is something like IDE with DMA (if everything is in buffer cache
then it's doing basically just a memcpy() from cache to the destination
place) - can't believe it would be that slow.

Don't have profiling numbers at hand but one of the main purposes of
nfhd was to be way way faster than the emulated IDE. Something must be
seriously wrong somewhere.

Petr


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to