Fix bounds checking on slot-space pointer movement.
Remove redundant test for zero byte-lanes value.
Fix broken byte-lanes vs. address validation.

Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fth...@telegraphics.com.au>
---
 drivers/nubus/nubus.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nubus/nubus.c b/drivers/nubus/nubus.c
index 1acf31c..eac5ec2 100644
--- a/drivers/nubus/nubus.c
+++ b/drivers/nubus/nubus.c
@@ -92,9 +92,6 @@ static void nubus_rewind(unsigned char **ptr, int len, int 
map)
 {
        unsigned char *p=*ptr;
 
-       /* Sanity check */
-       if(len > 65536)
-               pr_err("rewind of 0x%08x!\n", len);
        while(len)
        {
                do
@@ -110,8 +107,7 @@ static void nubus_rewind(unsigned char **ptr, int len, int 
map)
 static void nubus_advance(unsigned char **ptr, int len, int map)
 {
        unsigned char *p = *ptr;
-       if(len>65536)
-               pr_err("advance of 0x%08x!\n", len);
+
        while(len)
        {
                while(not_useful(p,map))
@@ -124,10 +120,15 @@ static void nubus_advance(unsigned char **ptr, int len, 
int map)
 
 static void nubus_move(unsigned char **ptr, int len, int map)
 {
+       unsigned long slot_space = (unsigned long)*ptr & 0xFF000000;
+
        if(len > 0)
                nubus_advance(ptr, len, map);
        else if(len < 0)
                nubus_rewind(ptr, -len, map);
+
+       if (((unsigned long)*ptr & 0xFF000000) != slot_space)
+               pr_err("%s: moved out of slot address space!\n", __func__);
 }
 
 /* Now, functions to read the sResource tree */
@@ -822,8 +823,6 @@ void __init nubus_probe_slot(int slot)
                        continue;
 
                dp = *rp;
-               if(dp == 0)
-                       continue;
 
                /* The last byte of the format block consists of two
                   nybbles which are "mirror images" of each other.
@@ -832,7 +831,7 @@ void __init nubus_probe_slot(int slot)
                        continue;
                /* Check that this value is actually *on* one of the
                   bytelanes it claims are valid! */
-               if ((dp & 0x0F) >= (1<<i))
+               if (not_useful(rp, dp))
                        continue;
 
                /* Looks promising.  Let's put it on the list. */
-- 
2.10.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to