On 28 April 2017 at 07:27, Gustavo Padovan <[email protected]> wrote: > 2017-04-26 Christian König <[email protected]>: > >> Am 26.04.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Andres Rodriguez: >> > When a timeout of zero is specified, the caller is only interested in >> > the fence status. >> > >> > In the current implementation, dma_fence_default_wait will always call >> > schedule_timeout() at least once for an unsignaled fence. This adds a >> > significant overhead to a fence status query. >> > >> > Avoid this overhead by returning early if a zero timeout is specified. >> > >> > v2: move early return after enable_signaling >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Andres Rodriguez <[email protected]> >> >> Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]> > > pushed to drm-misc-next. Thanks all.
I don't see this patch in -rc2, where did it end up going? Dave.
