Hi,

On 08/01/2014 06:15 PM, panpan liu wrote:
> Because the api s5p_mfc_queue_setup has already realized the same function
> 
> Signed-off-by: panpan liu <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c |    9 +--------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c 
> b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c
> 
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c
> @@ -544,14 +544,7 @@ static int vidioc_reqbufs(struct file *file, void *priv,
>                       mfc_err("vb2_reqbufs on capture failed\n");
>                       return ret;
>               }
> -             if (reqbufs->count < ctx->pb_count) {
> -                     mfc_err("Not enough buffers allocated\n");
> -                     reqbufs->count = 0;
> -                     s5p_mfc_clock_on();
> -                     ret = vb2_reqbufs(&ctx->vq_dst, reqbufs);
> -                     s5p_mfc_clock_off();
> -                     return -ENOMEM;
> -             }
> +

As Hans said, you should always check the latest upstream kernel. Why do
you post patches based on old kernel at ML continuously?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to