Hi Sakari,
On 07/02/15 15:01, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 01:33:48PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> From: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
>>
>> While normal video/radio/vbi/swradio nodes have a proper QUERYCAP ioctl
>> that apps can call to determine that it is indeed a V4L2 device, there
>> is currently no equivalent for v4l-subdev nodes. Adding this ioctl will
>> solve that, and it will allow utilities like v4l2-compliance to be used
>> with these devices as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
>> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
>> index 6359606..2ab1f7d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> #include <linux/videodev2.h>
>> #include <linux/export.h>
>> +#include <linux/version.h>
>>
>> #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
>> #include <media/v4l2-device.h>
>> @@ -187,6 +188,24 @@ static long subdev_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned
>> int cmd, void *arg)
>> #endif
>>
>> switch (cmd) {
>> + case VIDIOC_SUBDEV_QUERYCAP: {
>> + struct v4l2_subdev_capability *cap = arg;
>> +
>> + cap->version = LINUX_VERSION_CODE;
>> + cap->device_caps = 0;
>> + cap->pads = 0;
>> + cap->entity_id = 0;
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER)
>> + if (sd->entity.parent) {
>> + cap->device_caps = V4L2_SUBDEV_CAP_ENTITY;
>> + cap->pads = sd->entity.num_pads;
>> + cap->entity_id = sd->entity.id;
>> + }
>> +#endif
>> + memset(cap->reserved, 0, sizeof(cap->reserved));
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> case VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL:
>> return v4l2_queryctrl(vfh->ctrl_handler, arg);
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h
>> b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h
>> index dbce2b5..e48b9fd 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-subdev.h
>> @@ -154,9 +154,21 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_selection {
>> __u32 reserved[8];
>> };
>>
>> +struct v4l2_subdev_capability {
>> + __u32 version;
>> + __u32 device_caps;
>
> This is called capabilities in struct v4l2_capability. I'd follow the same
> pattern.
No, it's called device_caps in struct v4l2_capability. The capabilities field
in that same structure contains the capabilities of the device as a whole: so
not just of the device node in question, but the union of the capabilities of
all device nodes created by the driver.
>
>> + __u32 pads;
>> + __u32 entity_id;
>
> What's the use case for the entity_id field btw.? Supposing that the user
> wouldn't be using the MC interface to obtain it, is the entity_id relevant
> in this context? Or is your intent first open the sub-device, and then find
> out more information on the entity?
Right, the latter. I want to be able to do v4l2-compliance -d /dev/v4l-subdev0
and it should be able to figure everything out from there.
>
>> + __u32 reserved[48];
>
> Why 48?
Can't remember :-)
>
> As memory is typically allocated in powers of two (or n^2 + (n-1)^2), how
> about aligning it accordingly? I don't think we lose anything by making this
> e.g. 60. Although 28 would probably suffice as well (or 29 with the pads
> field removed as discussed). Even that much sounds like a lot.
29 would work fine as well. In general I am more generous with reserved fields
these days since we've hit the limits of it too often.
Regards,
Hans
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* This v4l2_subdev is also a media entity and the entity_id field is valid
>> */
>> +#define V4L2_SUBDEV_CAP_ENTITY (1 << 0)
>> +
>> /* Backwards compatibility define --- to be removed */
>> #define v4l2_subdev_edid v4l2_edid
>>
>> +#define VIDIOC_SUBDEV_QUERYCAP _IOR('V', 0, struct
>> v4l2_subdev_capability)
>> #define VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_FMT _IOWR('V', 4, struct
>> v4l2_subdev_format)
>> #define VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FMT _IOWR('V', 5, struct
>> v4l2_subdev_format)
>> #define VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_FRAME_INTERVAL _IOWR('V', 21, struct
>> v4l2_subdev_frame_interval)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html