On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:28:18 -0600 (CST)
Mike Isely <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Mike Isely wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > There were an upstream change usb_lock_device_for_reset() that touched on
> > > pvrusb2 driver. I didn't backport it yet, since I'm not sure if the
> > > change is
> > > ok. Could you please check?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mauro.
> >
> > Yes, the pvrusb2 part of this change looks fine (just change the
> > treatment of the return code).
>
> Before I cause any confusion, the above sentence has a critical typo.
> I was just pointing out that the pvrusb2 change in the patch below only
> adjusts the treatment of the return code, which makes perfect sense
> given the upstream change. I wasn't asking you to change anything :-)
> The change is fine.
Ok. The backport of this patch would be something interesting...
It will be something like this:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,29)
if (ret == 0)
#else
if (ret == 1)
#endif
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
