On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > in kernel. That means that we shouldn't add a changeset that we know that it > will break a device, except if we are committing, in the same patch series, > another patch fixing it.
I wouldn't even do that. If you know the patch has a problem with it, fix the patch. Submitting a patch know you has problems is inconsiderate to other developers. They are going to waste their time looking at a broken patch and finding the bugs, only to discover they've already been found and all their effort is pointless. It also makes it hard for those to work on older kernels, e.g. for embedded devices, and need to backport features. You find that patch that adds the feature you need to backport, only to later discover problems that, after much effort, are traced to the backported patch. Turns out the problems were known with the patch was committed and already fixed, but how were you supposed to know that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
