On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > >> <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > >> >> <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> >> > This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. > >> >> > Please, > >> >> > review and test. My current patch-stack in the form of a > >> >> > (manually-created) quilt-series is at > >> >> > http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090415/ based on linux-next > >> >> > history branch, commit ID in 0000-base file. Don't be surprised, that > >> >> > patch-set also contains a few not directly related patches. > >> >> > >> >> Testing on Migo-R board with 2.6.30-rc2-git-something and the > >> >> following cherry-picked patches: > >> >> > >> >> 0007-driver-core-fix-driver_match_device.patch > >> >> 0033-soc-camera-host-driver-cleanup.patch > >> >> 0034-soc-camera-remove-an-extra-device-generation-from-s.patch > >> >> 0035-soc-camera-simplify-register-access-routines-in-mul.patch > >> >> and part of 0036 (avoiding rejects, ap325 seems broken btw) > >> > > >> > Have I broken it or is it unrelated? > >> > >> 2.6.30-rc seems broken on Migo-R. A quick check suggests the following: > > > > Ok, before we come to Migo-R, what is with ap325? Have I broken it with > > this my series or is it a different problem? > > Not sure. I used 2.6.30-rc but I guess your patches are aimed at linux-next. > > >> V4L/DVB (10141): OK > >> V4L/DVB (10672): BAD > >> V4L/DVB (11024): BAD > > > > These seem to be pretty random snapshots... Are they all on Linus' master > > or on next or on v4l-dvb? You did pick up the > > > > 0007-driver-core-fix-driver_match_device.patch > > Yeah, I tried that one. I'm not sure what was the problem, but it's gone now. > > Today I've tested the following on top of linux-2.6 (stable 2.6.30-rc) > d91dfbb41bb2e9bdbfbd2cc7078ed7436eab027a > > 0033-soc-camera-host-driver-cleanup.patch > 0034-soc-camera-remove-an-extra-device-generation-from-s.patch > 0035-soc-camera-simplify-register-access-routines-in-mul.patch > > So far OK. > However, applying 0036- or v2 from the mailing list results in rejects > (probably because linux-next vs linux-2.6 differences) but the files > should not affect Migo-R. > > So with 0036 or v2 applied it builds ok for Migo-R, but I can't open > /dev/video0 for some reason. Reverting the patch and only using > 0033->0035 above results in ok /dev/video0 opening.
Did you have video drivers build in or as modules? If modules - in which order did you load them? Unfortunately, at the moment it might be important:-( What's in dmesg after loading all drivers? > What are your dependencies? > > I'll try out your 20090415/series on top of the matching linux-next for now. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
