Em Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:08:31 +0200
"Hans Verkuil" <[email protected]> escreveu:
> > I did some tests here: if we replace -EINVAL with -ENOIOCTLCMD, we can
> > properly
> > make v4l2_device_call_until_err() to work, fixing the lack of a proper
> > error
> > report at the drivers. This error code seems also appropriate for this
> > case.
>
> This is not sufficient: v4l2_device_call_until_err is not really suitable
> for this.
Agreed. Yet, the tests helped to see what changes were needed.
>This would be better:
>
> #define __v4l2_device_call_subdevs_ctrls(v4l2_dev, cond, o, f, args...) \
> ({ \
> struct v4l2_subdev *sd; \
> long err = 0; \
> \
> list_for_each_entry(sd, &(v4l2_dev)->subdevs, list) { \
> if ((cond) && sd->ops->o && sd->ops->o->f) \
> err = sd->ops->o->f(sd , ##args); \
> if (err && err != -ENOIOCTLCMD) \
No, this is not right. In the case of controls, it should be, instead:
if (err != -ENOIOCTLCMD)
Also, such routine is has nothing specific for ctrls, so, the naming doesn't
look nice. I'll find a better name.
> break; \
> } \
> (err == -ENOIOCTLCMD) ? -EINVAL : err; \
> })
>
> This way -EINVAL is returned if the control isn't handled anywhere.
Ok, but I'm in doubt if -EINVAL is the better return code on such case, but, in
order to not break backward compatibility, better to return -EINVAL.
> >
> > This means several trivial patches on each v4l device driver, just
> > replacing
> > the error codes for 3 ioctl handlers (s_ctrl, g_ctrl, queryctrl).
> >
> > I'll try to write such patches for v4l devices, since I want to get rid of
> > this
> > bug on 2.6.31, at least on em28xx driver. If I have more time, I'll fix
> > other
> > bridge drivers as well.
>
> Keep in mind that changing this for one i2c driver will mean that you have
> to check its behavior on all v4l2 drivers that use that i2c driver.
As drivers currently don't check for the returned code (maybe except for a very
few ones), this probably is not a big issue. Yet, I'll use a semantic check to
generate the patches, to be sure that all cases were covered.
> >> Currently the control handling code in our v4l drivers is, to be blunt,
> >> a
> >> pile of crap. And it is ideal to move this into the v4l2 framework since
> >> 90% of this is common code.
> >
> > Hmm, except for a few places that still implement this at the old way,
> > most of
> > the common code is already at v4l2 core. So, I'm not sure what you're
> > referring.
>
> Just to name a few:
>
> 1) Range checking of the control values.
> 2) Generic handling of QUERYCTRL/QUERYMENU including standard support for
> the V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_NEXT_CTRL.
> 3) Generic handling of the VIDIOC_G/S/TRY_EXT_CTRLS ioctls so all drivers
> can handle them.
> 4) Controls that are handled in subdevs should be automatically detected
> by the core so that they are enumerated correctly.
>
> There really is no support for this in the core, except for some utility
> functions in v4l2-common.c.
Ok.
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
