On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I understand the comparison, but I just think it's better if people > always keep track of what has been allocated and what has not. I tried > so hard to get Markus to stop sending those hundreds of patches where > he's like "this function has a sanity check so we can pass pointers > that weren't allocated"... It's garbage code. > > But I understand that other people don't agree. In my opinion, it is good for code understanding to only do what is useful to do. It's not a hard and fast rule, but I think it is something to take into account. julia > > regards, > dan carpenter > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
