Hi Linus, Lothar,
On 12/30/2016 05:17 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Steve Longerbeam
<slongerb...@gmail.com> wrote:
Add optional reset-gpios pin control. If present, de-assert the
specified reset gpio pin to bring the chip out of reset.
Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerb...@mentor.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnu...@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-g...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
This seems like a separate patch from the other 19 patches so please send it
separately so I can handle logistics easier in the future.
Ok, I'll send the next version separately.
@@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ struct pca953x_chip {
const char *const *names;
unsigned long driver_data;
struct regulator *regulator;
+ struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
Why do you even keep this around in the device state container?
As you only use it in the probe() function, use a local variable.
The descriptor will be free():ed by the devm infrastructure anyways.
I think my reasoning for putting the gpio handle into the device
struct was for possibly using it for run-time reset control at some
point. But that could be done later if needed, so I'll go ahead and
make it local.
+ /* see if we need to de-assert a reset pin */
+ chip->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev,
+ "reset",
+ GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+ if (IS_ERR(chip->reset_gpio)) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "request for reset pin failed\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(chip->reset_gpio);
+ }
Nice.
+ if (chip->reset_gpio) {
+ /* bring chip out of reset */
+ dev_info(&client->dev, "releasing reset\n");
+ gpiod_set_value(chip->reset_gpio, 0);
+ }
Is this really needed given that you set it low in the
devm_gpiod_get_optional()?
Yep, this is left over from a previous iteration, but it isn't needed now.
I'll remove it.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
