On 28 April 2017 at 07:27, Gustavo Padovan <gust...@padovan.org> wrote:
> 2017-04-26 Christian König <deathsim...@vodafone.de>:
>
>> Am 26.04.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Andres Rodriguez:
>> > When a timeout of zero is specified, the caller is only interested in
>> > the fence status.
>> >
>> > In the current implementation, dma_fence_default_wait will always call
>> > schedule_timeout() at least once for an unsignaled fence. This adds a
>> > significant overhead to a fence status query.
>> >
>> > Avoid this overhead by returning early if a zero timeout is specified.
>> >
>> > v2: move early return after enable_signaling
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Andres Rodriguez <andre...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
>
> pushed to drm-misc-next. Thanks all.

I don't see this patch in -rc2, where did it end up going?

Dave.

Reply via email to