On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:27:08PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com> writes: > > > No. All the other API functions there work with 32 bits for scancodes. > > We don't need them, do we? We need a new ioctl for changing key mappings > anyway (a single ioctl for setting the whole table I think), and we can > have arbitrary length of scan codes there.
Unless we determine that we 100% need bigger size of scancode then the current ioctls are just fine. Why do we _need_ an ioctl to load the whole tabe? Are you concerned about speed with which the keymap is populated? I don't think it would be an issue. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
