Em Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:31:18 +0100
Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl> escreveu:
> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
>
> Convert all g/s_parm calls to g/s_frame_interval. This allows us
> to remove the g/s_parm ops since those are a duplicate of
> g/s_frame_interval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/mt9v011.c | 31 +++++++-------------
> drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c | 35 +++++++++-------------
> drivers/media/i2c/ov7670.c | 24 +++++++--------
> drivers/media/i2c/ov7740.c | 31 +++++++-------------
> drivers/media/i2c/tvp514x.c | 39
> +++++++++----------------
> drivers/media/i2c/vs6624.c | 29 +++++++-----------
> drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c | 10 ++-----
> drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c | 12 ++------
> drivers/media/platform/blackfin/bfin_capture.c | 14 +++------
> drivers/media/platform/marvell-ccic/mcam-core.c | 12 ++++----
> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c | 10 ++++---
> drivers/media/platform/via-camera.c | 4 +--
> drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-video.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 13 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9v011.c b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9v011.c
> index 5e29064fae91..3e23c5b0de1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9v011.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9v011.c
> @@ -364,33 +364,24 @@ static int mt9v011_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int mt9v011_g_parm(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_streamparm
> *parms)
> +static int mt9v011_g_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval *ival)
> {
> - struct v4l2_captureparm *cp = &parms->parm.capture;
> -
> - if (parms->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - memset(cp, 0, sizeof(struct v4l2_captureparm));
> - cp->capability = V4L2_CAP_TIMEPERFRAME;
> + memset(ival->reserved, 0, sizeof(ival->reserved));
Hmm.. why to repeat memset everywhere? If the hole idea is to stop abusing,
the best would be to do, instead:
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
index c5639817db34..b18b418c080f 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
@@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ static long subdev_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
cmd, void *arg)
if (fi->pad >= sd->entity.num_pads)
return -EINVAL;
+ memset(fi->reserved, 0, sizeof(ival->reserved));
return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, g_frame_interval, arg);
}
(same applies to s_frame_interval).
> calc_fps(sd,
> - &cp->timeperframe.numerator,
> - &cp->timeperframe.denominator);
> + &ival->interval.numerator,
> + &ival->interval.denominator);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int mt9v011_s_parm(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_streamparm
> *parms)
> +static int mt9v011_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval *ival)
> {
> - struct v4l2_captureparm *cp = &parms->parm.capture;
> - struct v4l2_fract *tpf = &cp->timeperframe;
> + struct v4l2_fract *tpf = &ival->interval;
> u16 speed;
>
> - if (parms->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - if (cp->extendedmode != 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
Hmm... why are you removing those sanity checks everywhere?
The core doesn't do it.
All the above comments also apply to the other files modified by
this patch.
> + memset(ival->reserved, 0, sizeof(ival->reserved));
> speed = calc_speed(sd, tpf->numerator, tpf->denominator);
>
> mt9v011_write(sd, R0A_MT9V011_CLK_SPEED, speed);
> @@ -469,8 +460,8 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_core_ops mt9v011_core_ops
> = {
> };
>
> static const struct v4l2_subdev_video_ops mt9v011_video_ops = {
> - .g_parm = mt9v011_g_parm,
> - .s_parm = mt9v011_s_parm,
> + .g_frame_interval = mt9v011_g_frame_interval,
> + .s_frame_interval = mt9v011_s_frame_interval,
> };
>
> static const struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops mt9v011_pad_ops = {
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c
> index 8975d16b2b24..3f962dae7534 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c
> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ struct ov6650 {
> struct v4l2_rect rect; /* sensor cropping window */
> unsigned long pclk_limit; /* from host */
> unsigned long pclk_max; /* from resolution and format */
> - struct v4l2_fract tpf; /* as requested with s_parm */
> + struct v4l2_fract tpf; /* as requested with
> s_frame_interval */
> u32 code;
> enum v4l2_colorspace colorspace;
> };
> @@ -723,42 +723,33 @@ static int ov6650_enum_mbus_code(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int ov6650_g_parm(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_streamparm
> *parms)
> +static int ov6650_g_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval *ival)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
> struct ov6650 *priv = to_ov6650(client);
> - struct v4l2_captureparm *cp = &parms->parm.capture;
>
> - if (parms->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - memset(cp, 0, sizeof(*cp));
> - cp->capability = V4L2_CAP_TIMEPERFRAME;
> - cp->timeperframe.numerator = GET_CLKRC_DIV(to_clkrc(&priv->tpf,
> + memset(ival->reserved, 0, sizeof(ival->reserved));
> + ival->interval.numerator = GET_CLKRC_DIV(to_clkrc(&priv->tpf,
> priv->pclk_limit, priv->pclk_max));
> - cp->timeperframe.denominator = FRAME_RATE_MAX;
> + ival->interval.denominator = FRAME_RATE_MAX;
>
> dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Frame interval: %u/%u s\n",
> - cp->timeperframe.numerator, cp->timeperframe.denominator);
> + ival->interval.numerator, ival->interval.denominator);
Hmm... not sure if a debug is needed here. Yet, if this is needed,
IMHO, it would make mroe sense to move it to the core.
Thanks,
Mauro
