Hi Benoit,

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:35:16PM -0600, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> > +          csi2tx->base + CSI2TX_DPHY_CLK_WAKEUP_REG);
> I am sorry if I missed this previously but do all these
> CSI2TX_DPHY* reg access assume that "has_internal_dphy" is true?

It seems like it's needed even for the case without an internal
DPHY. I'll check, and add a comment if it's really the case.


Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to