On 04/19/18 13:15, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Making the cast right for get_user/put_user is not trivial, as
> it needs to ensure that the types are the correct ones.
> 
> Improve it by using macros.
> 
> Tested with vivid with:
>       $ sudo modprobe vivid no_error_inj=1
>       $ v4l2-compliance-32bits -a -s10 >32bits && v4l2-compliance-64bits -a 
> -s10 > 64bits && diff -U0 32bits 64bits
>       --- 32bits      2018-04-17 11:18:29.141240772 -0300
>       +++ 64bits      2018-04-17 11:18:40.635282341 -0300
>       @@ -1 +1 @@
>       -v4l2-compliance SHA   : bc71e4a67c6fbc5940062843bc41e7c8679634ce, 32 
> bits
>       +v4l2-compliance SHA   : bc71e4a67c6fbc5940062843bc41e7c8679634ce, 64 
> bits
> 
> Using the latest version of v4l-utils with this patch applied:
>       https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/48746/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@s-opensource.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c | 40 
> ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c 
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> index 8c05dd9660d3..d2f0268427c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,24 @@
>       get_user(__assign_tmp, from) || put_user(__assign_tmp, to);     \
>  })
>  
> +#define get_user_cast(__x, __ptr)                                    \
> +({                                                                   \
> +     get_user(__x, (typeof(*__ptr) __user *)(__ptr));                \
> +})
> +
> +#define put_user_force(__x, __ptr)                                   \
> +({                                                                   \
> +     put_user((typeof(*__x) __force *)(__x), __ptr);                 \
> +})
> +
> +#define assign_in_user_cast(to, from)                                        
> \
> +({                                                                   \
> +     typeof(*from) __assign_tmp;                                     \
> +                                                                     \
> +     get_user_cast(__assign_tmp, from) || put_user(__assign_tmp, to);\
> +})

Please add comments for these macros. It's not trivially obvious what they
do and why they are needed.

> +
> +
>  static long native_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long 
> arg)
>  {
>       long ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> @@ -543,8 +561,7 @@ static int get_v4l2_buffer32(struct v4l2_buffer __user 
> *p64,
>                       return -EFAULT;
>  
>               uplane = aux_buf;
> -             if (put_user((__force struct v4l2_plane *)uplane,
> -                          &p64->m.planes))
> +             if (put_user_force(uplane, &p64->m.planes))
>                       return -EFAULT;
>  
>               while (num_planes--) {
> @@ -682,7 +699,7 @@ static int get_v4l2_framebuffer32(struct v4l2_framebuffer 
> __user *p64,
>  
>       if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, p32, sizeof(*p32)) ||
>           get_user(tmp, &p32->base) ||
> -         put_user((void __force *)compat_ptr(tmp), &p64->base) ||
> +         put_user_force(compat_ptr(tmp), &p64->base) ||
>           assign_in_user(&p64->capability, &p32->capability) ||
>           assign_in_user(&p64->flags, &p32->flags) ||
>           copy_in_user(&p64->fmt, &p32->fmt, sizeof(p64->fmt)))
> @@ -831,8 +848,7 @@ static int get_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct file *file,
>       if (aux_space < count * sizeof(*kcontrols))
>               return -EFAULT;
>       kcontrols = aux_buf;
> -     if (put_user((__force struct v4l2_ext_control *)kcontrols,
> -                  &p64->controls))
> +     if (put_user_force(kcontrols, &p64->controls))
>               return -EFAULT;
>  
>       for (n = 0; n < count; n++) {
> @@ -898,12 +914,11 @@ static int put_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct file *file,
>               unsigned int size = sizeof(*ucontrols);
>               u32 id;
>  
> -             if (get_user(id, (unsigned int __user *)&kcontrols->id) ||
> +             if (get_user_cast(id, &kcontrols->id) ||
>                   put_user(id, &ucontrols->id) ||
> -                 assign_in_user(&ucontrols->size,
> -                                (unsigned int __user *)&kcontrols->size) ||
> +                 assign_in_user_cast(&ucontrols->size, &kcontrols->size) ||
>                   copy_in_user(&ucontrols->reserved2,
> -                              (unsigned int __user *)&kcontrols->reserved2,
> +                              (void __user *)&kcontrols->reserved2,

I would prefer to see this change merged with patch 4/6 instead. There
is no reason to correct it here.

>                                sizeof(ucontrols->reserved2)))
>                       return -EFAULT;
>  
> @@ -916,7 +931,7 @@ static int put_v4l2_ext_controls32(struct file *file,
>                       size -= sizeof(ucontrols->value64);
>  
>               if (copy_in_user(ucontrols,
> -                              (unsigned int __user *)kcontrols, size))
> +                              (void __user *)kcontrols, size))

Ditto for this one.

>                       return -EFAULT;
>  
>               ucontrols++;
> @@ -970,10 +985,9 @@ static int get_v4l2_edid32(struct v4l2_edid __user *p64,
>       if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, p32, sizeof(*p32)) ||
>           assign_in_user(&p64->pad, &p32->pad) ||
>           assign_in_user(&p64->start_block, &p32->start_block) ||
> -         assign_in_user(&p64->blocks,
> -                        (unsigned char __user *)&p32->blocks) ||
> +         assign_in_user_cast(&p64->blocks, &p32->blocks) ||
>           get_user(tmp, &p32->edid) ||
> -         put_user((void __force *)compat_ptr(tmp), &p64->edid) ||
> +         put_user_force(compat_ptr(tmp), &p64->edid) ||
>           copy_in_user(p64->reserved, p32->reserved, sizeof(p64->reserved)))
>               return -EFAULT;
>       return 0;
> 

Regards,

        Hans

Reply via email to