On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:45:06AM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Store the group pointer before disassociating the VIN from the group.
> 
> Fixes: 3bb4c3bc85bf77a7 ("media: rcar-vin: add group allocator functions")
> Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c 
> b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> index 7bc2774a11232362..d3072e166a1ca24f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> @@ -338,19 +338,21 @@ static int rvin_group_get(struct rvin_dev *vin)
>  
>  static void rvin_group_put(struct rvin_dev *vin)
>  {
> -     mutex_lock(&vin->group->lock);
> +     struct rvin_group *group = vin->group;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&group->lock);

Hi Niklas, its not clear to me why moving the lock is safe.
Could you explain the locking scheme a little?

>  
>       vin->group = NULL;
>       vin->v4l2_dev.mdev = NULL;
>  
> -     if (WARN_ON(vin->group->vin[vin->id] != vin))
> +     if (WARN_ON(group->vin[vin->id] != vin))
>               goto out;
>  
> -     vin->group->vin[vin->id] = NULL;
> +     group->vin[vin->id] = NULL;
>  out:
> -     mutex_unlock(&vin->group->lock);
> +     mutex_unlock(&group->lock);
>  
> -     kref_put(&vin->group->refcount, rvin_group_release);
> +     kref_put(&group->refcount, rvin_group_release);
>  }
>  
>  /* 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- 
> 2.17.0
> 

Reply via email to