On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 2:47 PM Gabriel Francisco Mandaji
<gfmand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @@ -667,10 +653,28 @@ static void vivid_overlay(struct vivid_dev *dev, struct
> vivid_buffer *buf)
> }
> }
>
> +static void vivid_cap_update_frame_period(struct vivid_dev *dev)
> +{
> + u64 f_period;
> +
> + f_period = (u64)dev->timeperframe_vid_cap.numerator * 1000000000;
> + do_div(f_period, dev->timeperframe_vid_cap.denominator);
> + if (dev->field_cap == V4L2_FIELD_ALTERNATE)
> + do_div(f_period, 2);
> + /*
> + * If "End of Frame", then offset the exposure time by 0.9
> + * of the frame period.
> + */
> + dev->cap_frame_eof_offset = f_period * 9;
> + do_div(dev->cap_frame_eof_offset, 10);
> + dev->cap_frame_period = f_period;
> +}
Doing two or three do_div() operations is going to make this rather
expensive on 32-bit architectures, and it looks like this happens for
each frame?
Since each one is a multiplication followed by a division, could this
be changed to using a different factor followed by a bit shift?
Arnd
