Hi Jacopo,

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 06:31:42PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:02:25PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Instead of using the convenience function
> > v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints(), parse the endpoints and set
> > up the async sub-devices without using callbacks. While this adds a little
> > bit of code, it makes parsing the endpoints quite a bit more simple and
> > gives more control to the driver over the process. The parsing assumes
> > D-PHY instead of letting the V4L2 fwnode framework guess it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c | 92 
> > +++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c 
> > b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c
> > index 690d3bd08ddd..40e8b8617f55 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c
> > @@ -1475,36 +1475,51 @@ static const struct v4l2_async_notifier_operations 
> > cio2_async_ops = {
> >     .complete = cio2_notifier_complete,
> >  };
> >
> > -static int cio2_fwnode_parse(struct device *dev,
> > -                        struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint *vep,
> > -                        struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> > +static int cio2_parse_firmware(struct cio2_device *cio2)
> >  {
> > -   struct sensor_async_subdev *s_asd =
> > -                   container_of(asd, struct sensor_async_subdev, asd);
> > +   unsigned int i;
> > +   int ret;
> >
> > -   if (vep->bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
> > -           dev_err(dev, "Only CSI2 bus type is currently supported\n");
> > -           return -EINVAL;
> > -   }
> > +   for (i = 0; i < CIO2_NUM_PORTS; i++) {
> > +           struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint vep = {
> > +                   .bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY
> > +           };
> > +           struct sensor_async_subdev *s_asd = NULL;
> > +           struct fwnode_handle *ep;
> >
> > -   s_asd->csi2.port = vep->base.port;
> > -   s_asd->csi2.lanes = vep->bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes;
> > +           ep = fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id(
> > +                   dev_fwnode(&cio2->pci_dev->dev), i, 0,
> > +                   FWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NEXT);
> >
> > -   return 0;
> > -}
> > +           if (!ep)
> > +                   continue;
> >
> > -static int cio2_notifier_init(struct cio2_device *cio2)
> > -{
> > -   int ret;
> > +           ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(ep, &vep);
> > +           if (ret)
> > +                   goto err_parse;
> >
> > -   v4l2_async_notifier_init(&cio2->notifier);
> > +           s_asd = kzalloc(sizeof(*s_asd), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +           if (!s_asd) {
> > +                   ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +                   goto err_parse;
> > +           }
> >
> > -   ret = v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints(
> 
> How would you feel trying to remove this function completely? There
> are only 2 users mainline (rcar-vin and sunxi) and this is 'yet
> another way to parse an endpoint and add it to a notifier async list'.
> 
> I would say, stabilizing on the use of one of the three
> v4l2_async_notifier_add_ versions could be desirable...

I agree. The reason I didn't do it in this patchset is that I have no
hardware to test. I'd like to get in what I can test first.

> 
> > -           &cio2->pci_dev->dev, &cio2->notifier,
> > -           sizeof(struct sensor_async_subdev),
> > -           cio2_fwnode_parse);
> > -   if (ret < 0)
> > -           goto out;
> > +           s_asd->csi2.port = vep.base.port;
> > +           s_asd->csi2.lanes = vep.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes;
> > +
> > +           ret = v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev(
> > +                   &cio2->notifier, ep, &s_asd->asd);
> > +           fwnode_handle_put(ep);
> > +           if (ret)
> > +                   goto err_parse;
> > +
> > +           continue;
> > +
> > +err_parse:
> > +           fwnode_handle_put(ep);
> 
> Won't the notifier cleanup put this device node for us?

There was an error so no. But we already did so before checking for the
error. Good catch! ;)

> 
> This apart, for the patch itself:
> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+rene...@jmondi.org>
> 
> Thanks
>   j
> 
> > +           kfree(s_asd);
> > +           return ret;
> > +   }
> >
> >     /*
> >      * Proceed even without sensors connected to allow the device to
> > @@ -1512,25 +1527,13 @@ static int cio2_notifier_init(struct cio2_device 
> > *cio2)
> >      */
> >     cio2->notifier.ops = &cio2_async_ops;
> >     ret = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&cio2->v4l2_dev, &cio2->notifier);
> > -   if (ret) {
> > +   if (ret)
> >             dev_err(&cio2->pci_dev->dev,
> >                     "failed to register async notifier : %d\n", ret);
> > -           goto out;
> > -   }
> > -
> > -out:
> > -   if (ret)
> > -           v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&cio2->notifier);
> >
> >     return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void cio2_notifier_exit(struct cio2_device *cio2)
> > -{
> > -   v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&cio2->notifier);
> > -   v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&cio2->notifier);
> > -}
> > -
> >  /**************** Queue initialization ****************/
> >  static const struct media_entity_operations cio2_media_ops = {
> >     .link_validate = v4l2_subdev_link_validate,
> > @@ -1814,16 +1817,18 @@ static int cio2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
> >     if (r)
> >             goto fail_v4l2_device_unregister;
> >
> > +   v4l2_async_notifier_init(&cio2->notifier);
> > +
> >     /* Register notifier for subdevices we care */
> > -   r = cio2_notifier_init(cio2);
> > +   r = cio2_parse_firmware(cio2);
> >     if (r)
> > -           goto fail_cio2_queue_exit;
> > +           goto fail_clean_notifier;
> >
> >     r = devm_request_irq(&pci_dev->dev, pci_dev->irq, cio2_irq,
> >                          IRQF_SHARED, CIO2_NAME, cio2);
> >     if (r) {
> >             dev_err(&pci_dev->dev, "failed to request IRQ (%d)\n", r);
> > -           goto fail;
> > +           goto fail_clean_notifier;
> >     }
> >
> >     pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pci_dev->dev);
> > @@ -1831,9 +1836,9 @@ static int cio2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
> >
> >     return 0;
> >
> > -fail:
> > -   cio2_notifier_exit(cio2);
> > -fail_cio2_queue_exit:
> > +fail_clean_notifier:
> > +   v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&cio2->notifier);
> > +   v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&cio2->notifier);
> >     cio2_queues_exit(cio2);
> >  fail_v4l2_device_unregister:
> >     v4l2_device_unregister(&cio2->v4l2_dev);
> > @@ -1852,7 +1857,8 @@ static void cio2_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
> >     struct cio2_device *cio2 = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev);
> >
> >     media_device_unregister(&cio2->media_dev);
> > -   cio2_notifier_exit(cio2);
> > +   v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&cio2->notifier);
> > +   v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&cio2->notifier);
> >     cio2_queues_exit(cio2);
> >     cio2_fbpt_exit_dummy(cio2);
> >     v4l2_device_unregister(&cio2->v4l2_dev);
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >



-- 
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com

Reply via email to