On 9/16/19 8:38 PM, Jiunn Chang wrote:
> This frequency table will allow proper testing of tuner control.  There
> are three frequencies per analog broadcast type and broadcast system, so
> tuner increment and decrement can be tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp 
> b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> index 5e794d71..e0d58e6c 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> @@ -7,6 +7,83 @@
>  
>  #include "cec-follower.h"
>  
> +/*
> + * This table contains analog television channel frequencies in KHz.  There 
> are
> + * a total of three frequencies per analog broadcast type and broadcast 
> system.
> + *
> + * CEC 17 and CEC Table 31 of the 1.4 specification lists the available 
> analog
> + * broadcast types and broadcast systems.
> + *
> + * The table is indexed by [ana_bcast_type][bcast_system][i].
> + *

No need for this empty comment line.

These frequencies are based on data from a wikipedia page, right?

It's useful to add a link to that page in this comment.

> + */
> +static unsigned int analog_freqs_khz[3][9][3] =
> +{
> +     // cable
> +     {
> +             // pal-bg
> +             {471250, 479250, 487250},

Add a space after { and before } in this table.

> +             // secam-lq
> +             {615250, 623250, 631250},
> +             // pal-m
> +             {501250, 507250, 513250},
> +             // ntsc-m
> +             {519250, 525250, 531250},
> +             // pal-i
> +             {45750, 53750, 61750},
> +             // secam-dk
> +             {759250, 767250, 775250},
> +             // secam-bg
> +             {495250, 503250, 511250},
> +             // secam-l
> +             {639250, 647250, 655250},
> +             // pal-dk
> +             {783250, 791250, 799250}
> +     },
> +     // satellite
> +     {
> +             // pal-bg
> +             {519250, 527250, 535250},
> +             // secam-lq
> +             {663250, 671250, 679250},
> +             // pal-m
> +             {537250, 543250, 549250},
> +             // ntsc-m
> +             {555250, 561250, 567250},
> +             // pal-i
> +             {175250, 183250, 191250},
> +             // secam-dk
> +             {807250, 815250, 823250},
> +             // secam-bg
> +             {543250, 551250, 559250},
> +             // secam-l
> +             {687250, 695250, 703250},
> +             // pal-dk
> +             {831250, 839250, 847250}
> +     },
> +     // terrestrial
> +     {
> +             // pal-bg
> +             {567250, 575250, 583250},
> +             // secam-lq
> +             {711250, 719250, 727250},
> +             // pal-m
> +             {573250, 579250, 585250},
> +             // ntsc-m
> +             {591250, 597250, 603250},
> +             // pal-i
> +             {199250, 207250, 215250},
> +             // secam-dk
> +             {145250, 153250, 161250},
> +             // secam-bg
> +             {591250, 599250, 607250},
> +             // secam-l
> +             {735250, 743250, 751250},
> +             // pal-dk
> +             {169250, 177250, 185250}
> +     }
> +};
> +
>  void process_tuner_record_timer_msgs(struct node *node, struct cec_msg &msg, 
> unsigned me)
>  {
>       switch (msg.msg[1]) {
> 

Regards,

        Hans

Reply via email to