On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 11:40 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:13:37AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 09:56 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > When I sent a patch, I use get_maintainer.pl then I add whoever the
> > > wrote the commit from the Fixes tag. Then I remove Colin King and Kees
> > > Cook from the CC list because they worked all over the tree and I know
> > > them. I also normally remove LKML if there is another mailing list but
> > > at least one subsystem uses LKML for patchwork so this isn't safe.
> > >
> > > So the safest instructions are "Use get_matainer.pl and add the person
> > > who wrote the commit in the Fixes tag".
> >
> > Maybe add this:
> >
> > Add the signers of any commit referenced in a "Fixes: <commit>" line
> > of a patch description.
>
> Oh yes please! I've always done this manually, so that's a nice bit of
> automation. :)
>
> Is "6" a safe lower bound here? I thought 12 was the way to go?
[]
> $ git log | egrep 'Fixes: [a-f0-9]{1,40}' | col2 | awk '{print length }' |
> sort | uniq -c | sort -n | tail
> 238 8
> 300 7
> 330 14
> 344 6
> 352 11
> 408 40
> 425 10
> 735 16
> 1866 13
> 31446 12
>
> Hmpf, 6 is pretty high up there...
Yes, but your grep then col2 isn't right.
You are counting all the 'Fixes: commit <foo>' output
as 6 because that's the length of 'commit'.
I also think the length of the hex commit value doesn't
matter much as it's got to be a specific single commit
SHA1 anyway, otherwise the commit id lookup will fail.
> > > @@ -1031,6 +1040,7 @@ MAINTAINER field selection options:
> > --roles => show roles (status:subsystem, git-signer, list, etc...)
> > --rolestats => show roles and statistics (commits/total_commits, %)
> > --file-emails => add email addresses found in -f file (default: 0
> > (off))
> > + --fixes => for patches, add signatures of commits with 'Fixes:
> > <commit>' (default: 1 (on))
>
> Should "Tested-by" and "Co-developed-by" get added to @signature_tags ?
All "<foo>-by:" signatures are added.
> @commit_authors is unused?
Yes, authors are already required to sign-off so
it's just duplicating already existing signatures.
