Hi Mauro,
Sorry for the delay, I was abroad. Let me detail the issue a bit more. In budget.c, the the frontend is attached this way : budget->dvb_frontend = dvb_attach(stv090x_attach, &tt1600_stv090x_config, &budget->i2c_adap, STV090x_DEMODULATOR_0); This means that the tt1600_stv090x_config structure will be common for all the cards. Then the tuner is attached to the frontend : ctl = dvb_attach(stv6110x_attach, budget->dvb_frontend, &tt1600_stv6110x_config, &budget->i2c_adap); Once the tuner is attached, the ops are copied to the config : tt1600_stv090x_config.tuner_sleep = ctl->tuner_sleep; This results in the ops being set for subsequently attached cards while fe->tuner_priv is NULL. This is why a check for tuner_priv being set is mandatory when calling tuner_sleep(). However as pointed out, it may not be the best fix. Regards, Guy On Fri, 07 May 2010 22:26:13 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com> wrote: > Manu Abraham wrote: > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > <mche...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > > > >> This is the summary of the patches that are currently under review. > >> Each patch is represented by its submission date, the subject (up > >> to 70 chars) and the patchwork link (if submitted via email). > >> > >> P.S.: This email is c/c to the developers that some review action > >> is expected. > >> > >> May, 7 2010: [v2] stv6110x Fix kernel null pointer deref when > >> plugging two TT s2-16 http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/97612 > > > > > > How is this patch going to fix a NULL ptr dereference when more > > than 1 card is plugged in ? The patch doesn't seem to do what the > > patch title implies. At least the patch title seems to be wrong. > > Maybe the patch is supposed to check for a possible NULL ptr > > dereference when put to sleep ? > > (c/c patch author, to be sure that he'll see your explanation request) > > His original patch is at: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/91929/ > > The original description with the bug were much better than version 2. > > From his OOPS log and description, I suspect that he's facing some > sort of race condition with the two cards. > > This fix seems still valid (with an updated comment), as his dump > proofed that there are some cases where fe->tuner_priv can be null, > generating an OOPS, but it seems that his patch is combating > the effect, and not the cause. > > So, I am for adding his patch for now, and then work on a more > complete approach for the two cards environment. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
