On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 15:54 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/05/2010 10:56 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:56:54 +0200 > > Hans de Goede<hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> I think that using one control for both status leds (which is what we > >> are usually talking about) and illuminator(s) is a bad idea. I'm fine > >> with standardizing these, but can we please have 2 CID's one for > >> status lights and one for the led. Esp, as I can easily see us > >> supporting a microscope in the future where the microscope itself or > >> other devices with the same bridge will have a status led, so then we > >> will need 2 separate controls anyways. > > > > Hi Hans, > > > > I was not thinking about the status light (I do not see any other usage > > for it), but well about illuminators which I saw only in microscopes. > > > > Ah, ok thanks for clarifying. For some more on this see p.s. below. > > > So, which is the better name? V4L2_CID_LAMPS? V4L2_CID_ILLUMINATORS? > > I think that V4L2_CID_ILLUMINATORS together with a comment in the .h > and explanation in the spec that this specifically applies to microscopes > would be good.
I concur with ILLUMINATORS. The word makes it very clear the control is about actively putting light on a subject. A quick Goggle search shows that the term 'illuminator" appears to apply to photography and IR cameras as well. > Regards, > > Hans > > p.s. > > I think it would be good to have a V4L2_CID_STATUS_LED too. In many drivers > we are explicitly controlling the led by register writes. Some people may very > well prefer the led to always be off. I know that uvc logitech cameras have > controls for the status led through the extended uvc controls. Once we have > a standardized LED control, we can move the logitech uvc cams over from > using their own private one to this one. I saw two use cases mentioned for status LEDs: 1. always off 2. driver automatically controls the LEDs. Can't that choice be handled with a module option, is there a case where one needs more control? Regards, Andy > Once this is in place I would like to build some framework in to gspca > for supporting this control in gspca (the control would be handled by the > core, > and sub drivers would have an sd_set_led function). > > While at it could you write a proposal / patch for adding this control to the > spec as well ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
