>>>>> "Andy" == Andy Walls <awa...@md.metrocast.net> writes:
Hi, Andy> Incandescent and Halogen lamps that effect an image coming into a Andy> camera are *not* LEDs that blink or flash automatically based on Andy> driver or system trigger events. They are components of a video Andy> capture system with which a human attempts to adjust the Andy> appearance of an image of a subject by changing the subject's Andy> environment. These illuminators are not some generically Andy> connected device, but controlled by GPIO's on the camera's bridge Andy> or sensor chip itself. Such an illuminator will essentially be Andy> used only in conjunction with the camera. Agreed. Andy> Status LEDs integrated into webcam devices that are not generically Andy> connected devices but controlled with GPIOs on the camera's bridge or Andy> sensor chip will also essentially be used only in conjunction with the Andy> camera. Or for any other usage the user envision - E.G. I could imagine using the status led of the webcam in my macbook for hard disk or wifi activity. I'm sure other people can come up with more creative use cases as well. Andy> Turning these sorts camera specific illuminators and LEDs on an off Andy> should be as simple to implement for an application developer as it is Andy> to grasp the concept of turning a light bulb on and off. The point is that the logic rarely needs to be in the v4l applications. The status LEDs should by default go on when the v4l device is active and go off again when not like it used to do. A v4l application developer would normally not want to worry about such things, and only care about the video data. But if a user wants something special / non-standard, then it's just a matter of changing LED trigger in /sys/class/leds/.. Andy> The LED interface seems more appropriate to use when the LEDs are Andy> connected more generically and will likely be used more generically, Andy> such as in an embedded system. The LED subsystem certainly has it uses in embedded, but it's also used on PCs - As an example the ath9k wireless driver exports a number of LEDs. I find the situation with the wlan LEDs pretty comparable to status LEDs on v4l devices. >> And yes, application developers must use the correct API to control >> stuff. >> Why should kernel duplicate interfaces just because >> user land don't want to use two different interfaces? Doesn't this sound a >> bit ... strange at least? Andy> Why should the kernel push multiple APIs on application developers to Andy> control a complex federation of small devices all connected behind a Andy> single bridge chip, which the user perceives as a single device? (BTW a Andy> USB microscope is such a federation which doesn't work at all without Andy> proper subject illumination.) Because that's the only sensible way to create a bunch of incompatible custom interfaces - E.G. a microphone built into a webcam is handled through also, not v4l, so it works with any sound recording program. Andy> V4L2 controls are how desktop V4L2 applications currently control Andy> aspects of a incoming image. Forcing the use of the LED interface in Andy> sysfs to control one aspect of that would be a departure from the norm Andy> for the existing V4L2 desktop applications. Andy> Forcing the use of the LED interface also brings along the complication Andy> of proper association of the illuminator or LED sysfs control node to Andy> the proper video capture/control device node. I have a laptop with a Andy> built in webcam with a status LED and a USB connected microscope with Andy> two illuminators. What are the steps for an application to discover the Andy> correct light for the video device and what settings that light is Andy> capable of: using V4L2 controls? using the LED interface? Again, for status LEDs I don't see any reason why a standard v4l tool would care. As I mentioned above, illuminators are a different story (comparable to a gain setting imho). Andy> How does one go about associating LEDs and Illuminators to video device Andy> nodes using the LED sysfs interface? I'm betting it's not as simple for Andy> applications that use V4L2 controls. I would imagine each video device would have a (number of) triggers, similar to how it's done for E.G. the wlan stuff - Something like "video0-active". The status LED of the video0 device would default to that trigger. Andy> I do not see how forcing applications to use a second control Andy> API, with no clear video device node<->led sysfs node association Andy> semantics, reduces application complexity, when those Andy> applications already support the V4L2 control API from which Andy> application can generically discover controls and their metadata Andy> and automatically know the associated video device. Again, I see the sysfs LED interface for status LEDs as more of a user/administrator interface than a programming API. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
