On Monday, September 20, 2010 19:08:44 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> A code excerpt is better than a long story, so here it is (from
> drivers/media/video/v4l2-device.c).
>
> > int v4l2_device_register_subdev(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
> > struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> > {
> > int err;
> >
> > /* Check for valid input */
> > if (v4l2_dev == NULL || sd == NULL || !sd->name[0])
> > return -EINVAL;
> > /* Warn if we apparently re-register a subdev */
> > WARN_ON(sd->v4l2_dev != NULL);
> > if (!try_module_get(sd->owner))
> > return -ENODEV;
> > /* This just returns 0 if either of the two args is NULL */
> > err = v4l2_ctrl_add_handler(v4l2_dev->ctrl_handler, sd-
> >ctrl_handler);
> > if (err)
>
> A call to module_put() is needed here. That one is easy to fix.
Oops. Good catch.
>
> > return err;
> > sd->v4l2_dev = v4l2_dev;
> > spin_lock(&v4l2_dev->lock);
> > list_add_tail(&sd->list, &v4l2_dev->subdevs);
> > spin_unlock(&v4l2_dev->lock);
>
> The subdev device node patches add a device node registration call here, and
> the call might fail. How do I cleanup the v4l2_ctrl_add_handler() call ?
> There
> doesn't seem to be any v4l2_ctrl_remove_handler() function. The same problem
> exists in v4l2_device_unregister_subdev(), you're not cleaning up the control
> framework there.
That's not a bug, there really isn't a counterpart to v4l2_ctrl_add_handler.
In case of an error during subdev registration the driver should just call
v4l2_ctrl_handler_free() which will free everything.
I do agree though that it is probably cleaner if I do add a remove_handler
type function.
Regards,
Hans
>
> > return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(v4l2_device_register_subdev);
>
>
--
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG, part of Cisco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
