On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:35:53 +0200 Jean-Francois Moine <moin...@free.fr> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:04:41 +0200
> Antonio Ospite <osp...@studenti.unina.it> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, the following change fixes it, was this what you had in mind?
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/gspca/gspca.c
[...]
>
> Yes, but, after thought, as there is only one alternate setting, the
> tests could be:
> if (gspca_dev->audio && i < gspca_dev->nbalt - 1)
> and
> if (gspca_dev->audio && i > 0)
>
> This should work also for isochronous transfers.
JF this change as is does not work for me, if I change the second check
to
if (gspca_dev->audio && i > 1)
it does, but I don't know if this breaks anything else.
In my case I have:
get_ep: gspca_dev->cam.reverse_alts: 0
get_ep: gspca_dev->alt: 1
get_ep: gspca_dev->nbalt: 1
get_ep: gspca_dev->audio: 1
get_ep: gspca_dev->cam.bulk: 1
Thanks,
Antonio
--
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it
PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
pgpUEGfNvIJAZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
