Em 19-10-2010 10:55, Florent AUDEBERT escreveu: > On 06/11/2010 06:01 PM, Florent AUDEBERT wrote: >> I noticed a stray 0x00 at init on DiSEqC bus (KNC1 DVB-S2) with a DiSEqC >> tool analyzer. >> >> I removed the register from initialization table and all seem to go well >> (at least for my KNC board). > > Hi, > > This old small patch had been marked superseded on patchwork[1]. > > Is there an non-obvious case when patches go superseded ? Perhaps I missed > something but it seems to me no other patch replaced it.
This is one of the bad things with patchwork: there's no "reason" field associated to a status change, nor it marks when the status were changed. A search on my linux-media box, showed that this patch were there, waiting for Manu review, at the email I sent on Jul, 6 2010. The patch still applies, and I didn't find any reply from Manu giving any feedback about it. So, I'm re-tagging it as under review. Manu, any comments about this patch (and the other remaining patches that we're waiting fro your review) ? > > > Regards, > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105621/ > Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
