Em 21-10-2010 18:06, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>> Add a parser for polaris mce. On this device, sometimes, a control
>> data appears together with the IR data, causing problems at the parser.
>> Also, it signalizes the end of a data with a 0x80 value. The normal
>> parser would believe that this is a time with 0x1f size, but cx231xx
>> provides just one byte for it.
>>
>> I'm not sure if the new parser would work for other devices (probably, it
>> will), but the better is to just write it as a new parser, to avoid breaking
>> support for other supported IR devices.
>
> After staring at it for a while, I think it would work okay for all 2nd and
> 3rd-gen mceusb devices, but it would almost certainly break 1st-gen, as it
> can have distinct IR data packets split across urb -- that's the whole reason
> for the if rem == 0 check in the existing routine.
>
> Ultimately though, this routine isn't that much different, and I *think* I
> see a way to extend the existing routine with some of the code from this one
> to make it work better for the polaris device.
>
> Will still go ahead with some review comments here though.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/IR/mceusb.c b/drivers/media/IR/mceusb.c
>> index 609bf3d..7210760 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/IR/mceusb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/IR/mceusb.c
>> @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ struct mceusb_dev {
>> u32 connected:1;
>> u32 tx_mask_inverted:1;
>> u32 microsoft_gen1:1;
>> + u32 is_polaris:1;
>> u32 reserved:29;
>
> reserved should be decremented by 1 here if adding another flag.
Ok. By curiosity, why are you reserving space on a bit array like that?
>> } flags;
>>
>> @@ -697,6 +698,90 @@ static int mceusb_set_tx_carrier(void *priv, u32
>> carrier)
>> return carrier;
>> }
>>
>> +static void mceusb_parse_polaris(struct mceusb_dev *ir, int buf_len)
>> +{
>> + struct ir_raw_event rawir;
>> + int i;
>> + u8 cmd;
>> +
>> + while (i < buf_len) {
>
> i is being used uninitialized here.
Ops!
>> + cmd = ir->buf_in[i];
>> +
>> + /* Discard any non-IR cmd */
>> +
>> + if ((cmd & 0xe0) >> 5 != 4) {
>
> I'd probably just stick with if ((cmd & 0xe0) != 0x80), or even !=
> MCE_PULSE_BIT, since we have a #define for 0x80 already. (Though its not
> quite an accurate name in this case).
Ok.
>> + i++;
>> + if (i >= buf_len)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + cmd = ir->buf_in[i]; /* sub cmd */
>> + i++;
>> + switch (cmd) {
>> + case 0x08:
>> + case 0x14:
>> + case 0x17:
>> + i += 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x11:
>> + i += 5;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x06:
>> + case 0x81:
>> + case 0x15:
>> + case 0x16:
>> + i += 2;
>> + break;
>
> #define's for each of these hex values would be good, if we can determine
> what they actually are.
Maybe we can determine a few of them, as they also occur at the debug parsing
loop.
>> + } else if (cmd == 0x80) {
>> + /*
>> + * Special case: timeout event on cx231xx
>> + * Is it needed to check if is_polaris?
>> + */
>> + rawir.pulse = 0;
>> + rawir.duration = IR_MAX_DURATION;
>> + dev_dbg(ir->dev, "Storing %s with duration %d\n",
>> + rawir.pulse ? "pulse" : "space",
>> + rawir.duration);
>> +
>> + ir_raw_event_store(ir->idev, &rawir);
>
> I think this and the prior hunk are really the only things that need to be
> grafted into the existing routine to make it behave with this device. Lemme
> see what I can come up with...
True, although the double loop at the original logic is a bit confusing. I
suspect you did it to handle
the (cmd & 0xe0) != 0x80 condition, probably at the gen1 times, and then you
modified it to handle other
devices.
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html