On Sunday, January 02, 2011 11:41:31 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 01-01-2011 17:53, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > The subject says it all:
> >
> > If there are no objections, then I propose that the deprecated et61x251 and
> > sn9c102 are moved to staging for 2.6.38 and marked for removal in 2.6.39.
>
> Nack.
>
> There are several USB ID's on sn9c102 not covered by gspca driver yet.
Why are these drivers marked deprecated then?
> It seems to me that et61x251 will also stay there for a long time, as there
> are
> just two devices supported by gspca driver, while et61x251 supports 25.
>
> Btw, we currently have a conflict with this USB ID:
> USB_DEVICE(0x102c, 0x6151),
>
> Both etoms and et61x251 support it, and there's no #if to disable it on one
> driver, if both drivers are compiled. We need to disable it either at
> gspca_etoms
> or at et61x251, in order to avoid users of having a random experience with
> this
> device.
Surely such devices should be removed from et61x251 or sn9c102 as soon as they
are
added to gspca?
Regards,
Hans
> >
> > If there are no objections, then I'll make a patch for this.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hans
> >
> Cheers,
> Mauro
>
--
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by Cisco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
