Em 13-01-2011 02:43, Vincent McIntyre escreveu:
> On 1/12/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> which on the face of it suggests
>>> btty-input.c
>
> already handled, my mistake.
>
>>> cx88-input.c
> the search string was in a comment
>
>>> hdpvr-i2c.c
> see below
>
>
>> I have no time currently to touch on it, since I still have lots of patches
>> to
>> take a look and submit for the merge window. So, if you have some time,
>> could you please prepare and submit a patch fixing it?
>
> This seems to be a relatively simple patch, inline below.
> This is against the linux-media tree, I could not figure out how
> to turn it into a clean patch of
> media_build/backports/v2.6.35_i2c_new_probed_device.patch
> I did look for guidance on how to do this in
> media_build/README.patches but could not find anything that looked
> relevant.
Well, there are two ways for doing it:
1) with two copies of linux/, one without your changes, and the other with
your changes;
2) you may create a temporary tree, just to do your patch. That's the way
I use. To avoid causing any confusion, I generally create the second
tree with mercurial.
Something like:
$ cd media_build/linux/
$ hg init
$ hg add *
$ hg commit
Then, I change the files, and I do:
$ hg diff > ../backports/my_new_patch.patch
In this specific case, before actually changing the files, I would do:
$ patch -p1 -i ../backports/v2.6.35_i2c_new_probed_device.patch -R
$ hg commit
$ patch -p1 -i ../backports/v2.6.35_i2c_new_probed_device.patch
<edit the files>
$ hg diff > ../backports/v2.6.35_i2c_new_probed_device.patch
> The code now compiles for me but I don't know if it will actually
> work, I don't have the hardware.
Ok, I did the above procedure, adding your patch to the diff. Please test.
Thanks,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html