Yeah!

Soooo... when I initialized the the camera (loading a 108 bytes
register listing) I just let run the camera and sent images.  So I
first realized a counter overflow  if (count++ > 100000) after a few
seconds. But this seemed to be handled correctly (ignore and delete
HS_VS_IRQ flag) while after 2 or more yavta calls it made the driver
hang.

I modified my register listing so that the chip gets "booted" silently.
In
static struct v4l2_subdev_video_ops framix_subdev_video_ops = {
        .s_stream       = framix_s_stream, <===============
};
I correctly check the stream status now and enable/disable the camera signals.

I am unsure whether the isp should be able to handle an ongoing data
stream independently of ISP_PIPELINE_STREAM_STOPPED.
If you decide it should, I will gladly help you find out more, just
ask. It worked on an OMAP3530 before, but I do not know if it is the
hardware or isp software that changed. Unfortunately I can't get an
3530 anymore (I trashed mine...).


You helped me so much! Big thanks.

Bastian Hecht



2011/4/14 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>:
> Hi Bastian,
>
> On Thursday 14 April 2011 10:33:12 Bastian Hecht wrote:
>> 2011/4/13 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@maxwell.research.nokia.com>:
>> > Bastian Hecht wrote:
>> >> Hello people,
>> >
>> > Hi Bastian,
>> >
>> > I'm cc'ing Laurent.
>> >
>> >> I switched to the new DM3730 from IGEP and while it's supposed to be
>> >> (almost) the same as the 3530 Version the isp deadlocks
>> >> deterministically after I start capturing the second time with yavta.
>> >
>> > Does the capture work the first time w/o issues?
>>
>> Yes, I can always run yavta once capturing 4 frames (3 skipped, last
>> saved). It usually deadlocks when running yavta the second time but I had
>> 1 successful 2nd try (out of 20 maybe).
>>
>> >> All extra locking debug output is enabled in the kernel .config.
>> >
>> > I'm not fully certain on what this exactly is that you have below, but
>> > it looks like your system is staying in interrupt context all the time.
>> > My guess is that the ISP is producing interrupts that the driver is not
>> > handling properly, causing the interrupt handler to be called again
>> > immediately.
>>
>> Nice! OK, I'd like to fully understand the panic output, maybe you can
>> help there:
>> After
>> [  376.016906] [<c02e3dc4>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0x44)
>> from [<bf01f678>] (omap3isp_video_queue_streamon+0x80/0x90
>> the IRQs get enabled again. Immediately our offending irq wants to get
>> served but noone is clearing it.
>> At some time, the timer interrupt triggers the watchdog for a kernel panic.
>> So the last exception block is the process context that is currently
>> active. But why are there 2 irq routines displayed? Is the middle one the
>> hardware handling that causes a software irq to be triggered (upper
>> block)?
>>
>> So my next step could be to find the unhandled irq number?
>
> If the problem is caused by an interrupt storm, the following patch will make
> your system responsive again after a couple of seconds (but will kill the ISP
> driver :-)). If it doesn't, the problem is likely caused by something else.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/omap3isp/isp.c
> b/drivers/media/video/omap3isp/isp.c
> index de2dec5..6497300 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/omap3isp/isp.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/omap3isp/isp.c
> @@ -462,6 +464,7 @@ static irqreturn_t isp_isr(int irq, void *_isp)
>                                       IRQ0STATUS_CCDC_VD0_IRQ |
>                                       IRQ0STATUS_CCDC_VD1_IRQ |
>                                       IRQ0STATUS_HS_VS_IRQ;
> +       static unsigned int count = 0;
>        struct isp_device *isp = _isp;
>        u32 irqstatus;
>        int ret;
> @@ -469,6 +472,11 @@ static irqreturn_t isp_isr(int irq, void *_isp)
>        irqstatus = isp_reg_readl(isp, OMAP3_ISP_IOMEM_MAIN, ISP_IRQ0STATUS);
>        isp_reg_writel(isp, irqstatus, OMAP3_ISP_IOMEM_MAIN, ISP_IRQ0STATUS);
>
> +       if (count++ > 100000) {
> +               isp_disable_interrupts(isp);
> +               return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +       }
> +
>        isp_isr_sbl(isp);
>
>        if (irqstatus & IRQ0STATUS_CSIA_IRQ) {
>
>
>> > Do you have the same sensor working on OMAP 3530?
>>
>> I never had this problem on an OMAP 3530, although I better test it
>> again with the current setup. I try to get my hands on an 3530 today.
>>
>> >> I am unsure if this is an ISP thing or a problem in the
>> >> interrupthandling software.
>> >
>> > This has probably something to do with the ISP driver. :-)
>> >
>> >> The first block is the watchdog that detects the deadlock. The last
>> >> block is in the isp-code but how can it hang when trying to UNlock a
>> >> spinlock? I am unsure about the 2nd block.
>> >> The assembler code of __irq_svc is located in
>> >> arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S Maybe I should try on
>> >> linux-...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk but I thought I give it a shot here
>> >> first.
>> >>
>> >> I use the omap3isp-2.6.35.3-omap3isp branch from Laurent.
>> >
>> > Why so old kernel?
>>
>> I tried a newer version, but there I couldn't get it booting with my
>> igep. The kernel unpacked and tried to boot but it froze.
>> I decided to use a version that is officially is supported by the igep
>> team.
>
> The ttyS* OMAP serial devices have been renamed to ttyO* in 2.6.37. Replace
> /dev/ttyS2 with /dev/ttyO2 on your kernel command line (either in the kernel
> config file if you've activated CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE, or in the boot loader
> environment variables) and you should be able to boot 2.6.38 without any
> issue. Don't forget to modify /etc/inittab as well.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to