Il 09/04/2012 14:34, Mauro Carvalho Chehab ha scritto:
> Hi Gianluca,
>
> Em 20-03-2012 11:10, Gianluca Gennari escreveu:
>
> Please avoid adding more tests for an specific Kernel version here. There are
> two issues with checks like that:
>
> 1) this may break on some kernel-fix release that might backport the
> function.
> This is not very common, but there was some cases like that, in the USB
> subsystem;
>
> 2) this generally breaks compilation, after some time, if someone tries
> to compile it against a distribution-patched kernel, as the new code may be
> backported there.
>
> That's said, if just doing an "#ifdef module_usb_driver" doesn't work because
> this
> is not a macro, you can add a simple check at this script:
> v4l/scripts/make_config_compat.pl
>
> like this one:
>
> check_file_for_func("include/linux/delay.h", "usleep_range",
> "NEED_USLEEP_RANGE");
>
> This function will seek for "usleep_range" at the delay.h header. If not
> found, it will
> add a #define NEED_USLEEP_RANGE at v4l/config-compat.h, that can be checked
> inside compat.h:
>
> #ifdef NEED_USLEEP_RANGE
> #define usleep_range(min, max) msleep(min/1000)
> #endif
>
> You can use the same kind of logic for module_usb_driver.
>
> Regards,
> Mauro
Hi Mauro,
thanks for the explanation but Hans Verkuil already solved the issue
using the check_file_for_func method:
http://git.linuxtv.org/media_build.git/commit/2492bf186743a925db98694911649fa0e94003f5
Of course, I agree this is a much better solution.
Regards,
Gianluca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
