"Igor M. Liplianin" <liplia...@me.by> writes:
> This patch seems for rectifying a typo. But actually the difference between
> mantis_vp2040.c and mantis_vp2033.c code is a card name only.
Yes, there are major code duplication issues in this driver.
> Signed-off-by: Igor M. Liplianin <liplia...@me.by>
> diff -r 990a92e2410f linux/drivers/media/dvb/mantis/mantis_cards.c
> --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/mantis/mantis_cards.c Wed May 09 01:37:05
> 2012 +0300
> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/mantis/mantis_cards.c Wed May 09 14:04:31
> 2012 +0300
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
> MAKE_ENTRY(TWINHAN_TECHNOLOGIES, MANTIS_VP_2033_DVB_C, &vp2033_config),
> MAKE_ENTRY(TWINHAN_TECHNOLOGIES, MANTIS_VP_2040_DVB_C, &vp2040_config),
> MAKE_ENTRY(TECHNISAT, CABLESTAR_HD2, &vp2040_config),
> - MAKE_ENTRY(TERRATEC, CINERGY_C, &vp2033_config),
> + MAKE_ENTRY(TERRATEC, CINERGY_C, &vp2040_config),
> MAKE_ENTRY(TWINHAN_TECHNOLOGIES, MANTIS_VP_3030_DVB_T, &vp3030_config),
> { }
> };
What's the point? It's a constructed difference. Makes more sense to
refactor and merge all the duplicated code instead of maintaining this
meaningless code split.
> diff -r 990a92e2410f linux/drivers/media/dvb/mantis/mantis_core.c
> --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/mantis/mantis_core.c Wed May 09 01:37:05
> 2012 +0300
> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/mantis/mantis_core.c Wed May 09 14:04:31
> 2012 +0300
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
> mantis->hwconfig = &vp2033_mantis_config;
> break;
> case MANTIS_VP_2040_DVB_C: /* VP-2040 */
> - case TERRATEC_CINERGY_C_PCI: /* VP-2040 clone */
> + case CINERGY_C: /* VP-2040 clone */
> case TECHNISAT_CABLESTAR_HD2:
> mantis->hwconfig = &vp2040_mantis_config;
> break;
And this file should never have been merged into the mainline kernel at
all. If you wonder how a bug like that could survive without being
noticed, then the explanation is simple: This code has never been built
as part of the driver in the mainline kernel.
I tried submitting a cleanup patch to have it removed a long time ago:
http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/3680/
but it doesn't seem to have gone anywhere, like most of the patches for
this driver - silently ignored until everyone forgets it and moves on.
The code could certainly benefit from a major cleanup, but I don't see
how that would ever happen. It sort of works. Better leave it there
and spend valuable time elsewhere.
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
