Hi Antti,
Antti Palosaari <cr...@iki.fi> wrote @ Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:11:56 +0200:
> Hello Hiroshi,
>
> I see you have added dev_dbg_ratelimited() recently, commit
> 6ca045930338485a8cdef117e74372aa1678009d .
>
> However it seems to be noisy as expected similar behavior than normal
> dev_dbg() without a ratelimit.
>
> I looked ratelimit.c and there is:
> printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: %d callbacks suppressed\n", func, rs->missed);
>
> What it looks my eyes it will print those "callbacks suppressed" always
> because KERN_WARNING.
Right. Can the following fix the problem?
>From 905b1dedb6c64bc46a70f6d203ef98c23fccb107 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hd...@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:02:11 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] driver-core: Shut up dev_dbg_reatelimited() without
DEBUG
dev_dbg_reatelimited() without DEBUG printed "217078 callbacks
suppressed". This shouldn't print anything without DEBUG.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hd...@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Antti Palosaari <cr...@iki.fi>
---
include/linux/device.h | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
index eb945e1..d4dc26e 100644
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -962,9 +962,13 @@ do {
\
dev_level_ratelimited(dev_notice, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define dev_info_ratelimited(dev, fmt, ...) \
dev_level_ratelimited(dev_info, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#if defined(DEBUG)
#define dev_dbg_ratelimited(dev, fmt, ...) \
dev_level_ratelimited(dev_dbg, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
-
+#else
+#define dev_dbg_ratelimited(dev, fmt, ...) \
+ no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#endif
/*
* Stupid hackaround for existing uses of non-printk uses dev_info
*
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
