Em Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:27:21 +0200
Anders Thomson <aerikss...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Ever since 2.6.26 or so (where there was a code reorg) I had to carry
> this patch.
> Without it the received signal is noisy, and the card worked fine prior
> to the code
> reorg. This patch is a hack, mostly as a result of my inability to
> follow the code
> paths (and bisect failing). I'd be more than willing to test whatever
> the proper
> patch might be prior to any mainlining.
>
> Thanks,
> /Anders
>
>
>
> $ cat /TV_CARD.diff
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/tuners/tda8290.c
> b/drivers/media/common/tuners/tda8290.c
> index 064d14c..498cc7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/tuners/tda8290.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/tuners/tda8290.c
> @@ -635,7 +635,11 @@ static int tda829x_find_tuner(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
>
> dvb_attach(tda827x_attach, fe, priv->tda827x_addr,
> priv->i2c_props.adap, &priv->cfg);
> + tuner_info("ANDERS: setting switch_addr. was 0x%02x, new
> 0x%02x\n",priv->cfg.switch_addr,priv->i2c_props.addr);
> priv->cfg.switch_addr = priv->i2c_props.addr;
> + priv->cfg.switch_addr = 0xc2 / 2;
No, this is wrong. The I2C address is passed by the bridge driver or by
the tuner_core attachment, being stored at priv->i2c_props.addr.
What's the driver and card you're using?
> + tuner_info("ANDERS: new 0x%02x\n",priv->cfg.switch_addr);
> +
> }
> if (fe->ops.tuner_ops.init)
> fe->ops.tuner_ops.init(fe);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
