Hi Sachin,

Thank you for your patch, fixing this bug and testing suspend/resume.

Best wishes,
--
Kamil Debski
Linux Platform Group
Samsung Poland R&D Center


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sachin Kamat [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 28 September 2012 09:02
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Fix misplaced return statement in
> s5p_mfc_suspend()
> 
> return statement was wrongly placed before a code that needs to be
> executed. Moved the return statement to the end of the function.
> 
> Tested suspend/resume on SMDK4412 board using 3.5-rc6 kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Kamil Debski <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c |    5 +++--
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> index e3e616d..e913a1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> @@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ static int s5p_mfc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> 
>       if (m_dev->num_inst == 0)
>               return 0;
> -     return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);
> +
>       if (test_and_set_bit(0, &m_dev->enter_suspend) != 0) {
>               mfc_err("Error: going to suspend for a second time\n");
>               return -EIO;
> @@ -1167,7 +1167,8 @@ static int s5p_mfc_suspend(struct device *dev)
>                       return -EIO;
>               }
>       }
> -     return 0;
> +
> +     return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);
>  }
> 
>  static int s5p_mfc_resume(struct device *dev)
> --
> 1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to