On 11/16/2012 07:02 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Some more comments...
>
> On Tue October 23 2012 20:44:31 Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> This commit adds a driver that exposes all the radio related
>> functionality of the Si476x series of chips via the V4L2 subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrey.smir...@convergeddevices.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/radio/Kconfig | 17 +
>> drivers/media/radio/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/media/radio/radio-si476x.c | 1549
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 1567 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/radio/radio-si476x.c
>>
> <cut>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/radio-si476x.c
>> b/drivers/media/radio/radio-si476x.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..c8fa90f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-si476x.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1549 @@
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
>> +#include <linux/videodev2.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>> +#include <media/v4l2-common.h>
>> +#include <media/v4l2-ioctl.h>
>> +#include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
>> +#include <media/v4l2-event.h>
>> +#include <media/v4l2-device.h>
>> +
>> +
>> +#include <linux/mfd/si476x-core.h>
>> +
>> +#define FM_FREQ_RANGE_LOW 64000000
>> +#define FM_FREQ_RANGE_HIGH 108000000
>> +
>> +#define AM_FREQ_RANGE_LOW 520000
>> +#define AM_FREQ_RANGE_HIGH 30000000
>> +
>> +#define PWRLINEFLTR (1 << 8)
>> +
>> +#define FREQ_MUL (10000000 / 625)
>> +
>> +#define SI476X_PHDIV_STATUS_LINK_LOCKED(status) (0b10000000 & (status))
>> +
>> +#define DRIVER_NAME "si476x-radio"
>> +#define DRIVER_CARD "SI476x AM/FM Receiver"
>> +
>> +enum si476x_freq_bands {
>> + SI476X_BAND_FM,
>> + SI476X_BAND_AM,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct v4l2_frequency_band si476x_bands[] = {
>> + [SI476X_BAND_FM] = {
>> + .type = V4L2_TUNER_RADIO,
>> + .index = SI476X_BAND_FM,
>> + .capability = V4L2_TUNER_CAP_LOW
>> + | V4L2_TUNER_CAP_STEREO
>> + | V4L2_TUNER_CAP_RDS
>> + | V4L2_TUNER_CAP_RDS_BLOCK_IO
>> + | V4L2_TUNER_CAP_FREQ_BANDS,
>> + .rangelow = 64 * FREQ_MUL,
>> + .rangehigh = 108 * FREQ_MUL,
>> + .modulation = V4L2_BAND_MODULATION_FM,
>> + },
>> + [SI476X_BAND_AM] = {
>> + .type = V4L2_TUNER_RADIO,
>> + .index = SI476X_BAND_AM,
>> + .capability = V4L2_TUNER_CAP_LOW |
>> V4L2_TUNER_CAP_FREQ_BANDS,
>> + .rangelow = 0.52 * FREQ_MUL,
>> + .rangehigh = 30 * FREQ_MUL,
>> + .modulation = V4L2_BAND_MODULATION_AM,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline bool si476x_radio_freq_is_inside_of_the_band(u32 freq, int
>> band)
>> +{
>> + return freq >= si476x_bands[band].rangelow &&
>> + freq <= si476x_bands[band].rangehigh;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool si476x_radio_range_is_inside_of_the_band(u32 low, u32
>> high, int band)
>> +{
>> + return low >= si476x_bands[band].rangelow &&
>> + high <= si476x_bands[band].rangehigh;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define PRIVATE_CTL_IDX(x) (x - V4L2_CID_PRIVATE_BASE)
> No. The new control IDs need to be added to include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h
> with unique IDs. V4L2_CID_PRIVATE_BASE must not be used anymore for new
> controls.
>
> Since Halli Manjunatha hasn't worked on a new version of his patch with the
> new
> fm controls it might be something you want to take on (I'm referring to the
> FM RX
> control class).
Should I move all controls there, even chip specific ones, like
SI476X_CID_HARMONICS_COUNT or SI476X_CID_DIVERSITY_MODE?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
