Hi,
On 12/15/2013 12:18 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
<snip>
4) Send the webcams that are not (or not correctly) supported by gscpa to Hans
de Goede, and let him add support for them to gspca. I don't know if he
wants to, though. He may well decide that it is not worth it, although I
assume he would be willing to at least fix gspca for webcams that are not
correctly supported.
Or alternatively simply send patches to add support for those not supported
to gspca. This should be easy.
I've even added support for some a sensor not supported by gspca when a user
reported to me he wanted to use his webcam with gspca. Porting over the sn9c102
sensor init code to gspca is pretty easy, the only thing which has stopped me
from doing so is not having hardware access. Since in this case I had a user
willing to test I added the support.
Note that AFAIK HdG has some of the webcams supported by both
gspca and sn9c102, I'm assuming those are working fine with gspca.
Correct I've the following sn9c10x bayer chipset cams I use for testing:
Sweex WC001 0c45:6005 sn9c101 tas5110c ok
Hewi 0c45:6007 sn9c101 tas5110d ok
Trust spacecam 120 0c45:600d sn9c101 pas106 ok
Sweex WC004 0c45:6011 sn9c101 ov6650 ok
Qware EasyCam WB-001 0c45:6028 sn9c102 pas202 ok
Also note that there are 0 bug-reports from users having issues with the
gspca_sonixb driver.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html