op 19-02-14 14:56, Thomas Hellstrom schreef:
>+static void fence_check_cb_func(struct fence *f, struct fence_cb *cb)
>+{
>+ struct sync_fence_cb *check = container_of(cb, struct sync_fence_cb, cb);
>+ struct sync_fence *fence = check->fence;
>+
>+ // TODO: Add a fence->status member and check it
Hmm, C++ / C99 style comments makes checkpatch.pl complain. Did you run
this series through checkpatch?
/Thomas
Actually I used c99 here because it shouldn't have been in the sent patch. ;-)
Right below that comment I use fence->status, so the right thing to do was to
zap the comment.
Thanks for catching it!
~Maarten\
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
