On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 02:09:41PM +0100, Kamil Debski wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
> 
> > From: Sakari Ailus [mailto:sakari.ai...@iki.fi]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 9:53 PM
> > 
> > Some devices do not produce timestamps that correspond to the end of
> > the frame. The user space should be informed on the matter. This patch
> > achieves that by adding buffer flags (and a mask) for timestamp sources
> > since more possible timestamping points are expected than just two.
> > 
> > A three-bit mask is defined (V4L2_BUF_FLAG_TSTAMP_SRC_MASK) and two of
> > the eight possible values is are defined V4L2_BUF_FLAG_TSTAMP_SRC_EOF
> > for end of frame (value zero) V4L2_BUF_FLAG_TSTAMP_SRC_SOE for start of
> > exposure (next value).
> > 
> 
> Changes in videobuf2-core.c look good.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@iki.fi>
> 
> Acked-by: Kamil Debski <k.deb...@samsung.com>

Many thanks for the reviews, Kamil! :-)

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi     XMPP: sai...@retiisi.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to