Hi Kaneko-san, Hi Sergei,

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:33:52PM +0900, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
> Hello Sergei,
> 
> 2014-10-21 19:22 GMT+09:00 Sergei Shtylyov 
> <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com>:
> > Hello.
> >
> > On 10/21/2014 9:08 AM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
> >
> >> From: Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka...@renesas.com>
> >
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka...@renesas.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >
> >
> >> This patch is against master branch of linuxtv.org/media_tree.git.
> >
> >
> >> v2 [Yoshihiro Kaneko]
> >> * remove unused/useless definition as suggested by Sergei Shtylyov
> >
> >
> >    I didn't say it's useless, I just suspected that you missed the necessary
> > test somewhere...
> 
> Sorry for my inaccurate description.
> 
> >
> >>   drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c | 9 +++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c
> >> b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c
> >> index 20defcb..cb5e682 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c
> >> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
> >>   #define VNMC_INF_YUV10_BT656  (2 << 16)
> >>   #define VNMC_INF_YUV10_BT601  (3 << 16)
> >>   #define VNMC_INF_YUV16                (5 << 16)
> >> +#define VNMC_INF_RGB888                (6 << 16)
> >>   #define VNMC_VUP              (1 << 10)
> >>   #define VNMC_IM_ODD           (0 << 3)
> >>   #define VNMC_IM_ODD_EVEN      (1 << 3)
> >
> > [...]
> >>
> >> @@ -331,6 +336,9 @@ static int rcar_vin_setup(struct rcar_vin_priv *priv)
> >>         if (output_is_yuv)
> >>                 vnmc |= VNMC_BPS;
> >>
> >> +       if (vnmc & VNMC_INF_RGB888)
> >> +               vnmc ^= VNMC_BPS;
> >> +
> >
> >
> >    Hm, this also changes the behavior for VNMC_INF_YUV16 and
> > VNMC_INF_YUV10_BT{601|656}. Is this actually intended?
> 
> Probably this code is incorrect.
> Thank you for your review.

Thanks, I have confirmed with Matsuoka-san that there is a problem here.

He has provided the following fix. Could you see about squashing it into
the above patch and reposting?


From: Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka...@renesas.com>

[PATCH] media: soc_camera: rcar_vin: Fix bit field check

Signed-off-by: Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka...@renesas.com>

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c 
b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c
index 013d75c..da62d94 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
 #define VNMC_INF_YUV8_BT601    (1 << 16)
 #define VNMC_INF_YUV16         (5 << 16)
 #define VNMC_INF_RGB888                (6 << 16)
-#define VNMC_INF_RGB_MASK      (6 << 16)
+#define VNMC_INF_MASK          (7 << 16)
 #define VNMC_VUP               (1 << 10)
 #define VNMC_IM_ODD            (0 << 3)
 #define VNMC_IM_ODD_EVEN       (1 << 3)
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static int rcar_vin_setup(struct rcar_vin_priv *priv)
        if (output_is_yuv)
                vnmc |= VNMC_BPS;
 
-       if (vnmc & VNMC_INF_RGB_MASK)
+       if ((vnmc & VNMC_INF_MASK) == VNMC_INF_RGB888)
                vnmc ^= VNMC_BPS;
 
        /* progressive or interlaced mode */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to